This is a discussion on Octane Differences within the F150 Ecoboost Chat forums, part of the F150 Ecoboost Forum category; Good post. I just returned from a 4800km trip from mb to victoria n back.I ran premium the entire trip. Like stated lots of long ...
Good post. I just returned from a 4800km trip from mb to victoria n back.I ran premium the entire trip. Like stated lots of long steady inclines along the route.I averaged 12.6 liters p 100 kms. With the extended range tank and premium fuel i was impressed with getting over 1000 km per tank in the mountains. :beer:
Sent from my SGH-I747M using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
I've started doing my own testing on fuel. Bought truck with a full tank of whatever they put in it. Guessing the cheapest they could buy. My next 2 tanks I filled with 89 non ethanol, my 04 Ranger loved it, so I figured this new one would too. Then went back to 87 with 10% ethanol, and didn't notice any change at all. Maybe when I get a few more miles I will notice a change with different fuels. For now I'll keep running the 87.
I only run 93 in my KR. You can feel the power difference don't really care about gas mileage though it sucks I get it.
You would have to use the higher octane if you have knock on 87. Don't know if i figured this out right but 30 gal of 87 $4.00= $120. Premium at $4.20 =$126. so the $6 you pay more would have to get you 27 miles farther then 87. to break even ave 18 MPG does that sound right?
Ok I'll bite...
As I understand it, octane levels are designed to combust and make your motor go vroooom based on compression ratios. Higher compression engines will burn higher octane more efficiently based on the chemical make up of the gas... thus why vehicles that recommend 93 will burn 87, but be very sluggish and get poor milage.
Here's my experience: I lived in the Toyo FJC world for a while and built a *****in' one. They take/recommend 93. This topic was discussed at UBER MEGA SUPER length on the FJC forum from probably 2008-2011. We were fortunate enough to have a Chemist for BP on the boards and he gave a hella-complex science answer that basically said what I stated above. You cant escape the chemical science of how the different octane fuels physically burn and create energy.
My FJC would run a solid 2 mpg better on 93 than 87, justifying the cost for me. Others negated that and only ran 87. To each their own, it's your truck and your money buying the gas. That being said, I've never owned a forced induction engine before, and never tuned either, and I'm sure that a multitude of factors will determine which fuel will burn the most completely, read efficiently, in each EB.
I am new to the learning curve of turbos and EB in general, but science is science.
The can is open. I'm already sorry...
O and a lot more on topic since the tune it has never seen anything other than 93 with 10% ethanol.
before the tune,I noticed the difference from when I added 93 after using up the dealer gas. my truck will never see anything other than 93 ever again. but for anyone testing, that can monitor boost and timing. you should do a wide open throttle 1-2-3 pull 87 and 93. I promise there will be significant differences. IMO the real question at hand is... is the price difference between 87 and 93, relevant to the increased mileage??? if I had to speculate. I highly doubt the added cost of 93 would negate the added fuel economy.
So I did a proof read after pressing Send,and found what I meant to say is I wanted to post this in the I'm drunk forum
Let me try again, the added cost of 93 will probably outweigh whatever potential added fuel economy.