I suggest you read the several threads that answer all your questions...and look at the pictures of the hydro locked pistons breaking rods and throwing them through rods, learn about the difference between port injection and direct injection, and how engine oil is unable to protect the rotating assy of the engine of full of water/unburnt fuel/ contaminating the oil so accelerated bearing wear and failure, etc. are not what most would want to protect their engine.just digging up an old thread..
Question about the whole "Catch Can" mania here..
Why? Please explain the reasoning behind this?
To my understanding it's to avoid Water vapors from entering your engine?
If this is the case why have they been selling water injection kits for decades that help turbo boosted cars perform better?
The whole idea that ingesting trace amounts of fuel or water is damaging to the engine is laughable. You're talking about what PPM here vs Fuel and Air? If it was 1:1 I'd be concerned, but odds are this is a very small amount of oil and water per compression stroke. The fact that it takes 5000 miles to get 1 cup tells me this.. 1 cup = 8fl-oz
5000miles/20mpg = 350Gallons of gas..
1gallon=128fl oz
128x350=44,800fl oz
you're talking 1 part per 5600..
5600:1 fuel to water/oil mix .. and what's the fuel to air ratio? Oh yeah.. 14.7 .. So lets toss that into the mix, shall we?
esentially it's about 82,000:1 regular combustion to crap ratio based on 1 cup per 5500 miles. If this is an inaccurate amount please let me know and I'll be glad to do more disproving math..
The following is a direct quote from a Wiki page, but you can do some quick research and find similar information all over the internet.
"In internal combustion engines, water injection, also known as anti-detonant injection, is spraying water into the incoming air or fuel-air mixture, or directly into the cylinder, in order to cool them. It was used historically to increase the power output of military aviation engines for short durations such as dogfights or takeoff, however it has also been used in motor sport and notably in drag racing. In Otto cycle engines the cooling effects of water injection also allow for greater compression ratios by reducing the problem of engine knocking (detonation). Alternately this reduction in engine knocking in Otto cycle engines means that in some applications significant performance gains can be obtained when water injection is used in conjunction with a supercharger, turbocharger and/or other modifications such as a more aggressive ignition timing. Depending on the engine, improvements in power and fuel efficiency can also be obtained solely by injecting water.[SUP][1][/SUP] Water injection may also be used to reduce NOx or carbon monoxide emissions.[SUP][1]"
[/SUP]
Woha!!!! Now your really off on another planet? Can you explain any of this absolutely false claim? Come on!!! Look at all the diagrams and tests....you sound like one of the Micky Mouse can koolaide drinkers that hasn't a clue on function and design. Take ANY can on the market, your choice. Install the RX can inline AFTER any can of your choice...Moroso, Billet Prototypes, Mike Norris, Mickey Mouse, and the RX can will catch as much to as much as 5-10 times any other can will.....and thats AFTER that can did its best first. Want links to results of these tests? Just ask.Oh, and if you still want/need a catch can, buy an ebay one that can open, put some filter media in it (steel or aluminum wool) and change that media out every few months. For $20.00 you can replace that junk monthly and still come out way ahead vs an RX can..
Sure, I dont' make a profit from the ebay catch cans.. You make profit on the $300+ ones you peddle here.I suggest you read the several threads that answer all your questions...and look at the pictures of the hydro locked pistons breaking rods and throwing them through rods, learn about the difference between port injection and direct injection, and how engine oil is unable to protect the rotating assy of the engine of full of water/unburnt fuel/ contaminating the oil so accelerated bearing wear and failure, etc. are not what most would want to protect their engine.
Then, since the EcoBoost has a flaw in the OEM PCV system that only allows evacuation at idle and low throttle, 80% plus of the time all these damaging compounds are accumulating in the crankcase causing this damage. So more reading we suggest as just coming in at this stage with what you posted is pretty foolish looking....lots of data here to save you time and get you up to date, then join in an intelligent discussion.
Woha!!!! Now your really off on another planet? Can you explain any of this absolutely false claim? Come on!!! Look at all the diagrams and tests....you sound like one of the Micky Mouse can koolaide drinkers that hasn't a clue on function and design. Take ANY can on the market, your choice. Install the RX can inline AFTER any can of your choice...Moroso, Billet Prototypes, Mike Norris, Mickey Mouse, and the RX can will catch as much to as much as 5-10 times any other can will.....and thats AFTER that can did its best first. Want links to results of these tests? Just ask.
You're joking right? You do realize that water injection is a metered charge of H2O and methanol in precise amounts. Hydro locking is water in a part of an engine that it has no business being there in amounts to cause terminal damage!In response to the earlier post about damaged engine parts. I believe we are more likely to see hydro locked engines because of a full catch can vs without running one. Or are you saying water injection is a myth??