F150 Ecoboost Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
21 - 33 of 33 Posts
It is really good compared to most trucks I’ve driven. I was just naively hoping it would be closer to what was advertised: 18/23. It’s a 2016 F150 4x4 2.7 L ecoboost + tow pkg with only 59,000 miles.
And advertised mpg is with -
1. Ethanol free gasoline
2. An XL 4x2 single cab truck

4x4 is extra weight and so is the tow package plus whatever your cab configuration is and options( power seats, more speakers, etc)
 
Excellent point.
So is towing capacity and cargo capacity.

The unicorn truck. :)
At least Ford will actually sell one to you if you are determined enough.

Although these days it takes the same amount of determination to buy the F150 you want regardless of what it might be.
 
Save
I've been consistently getting 900 miles per tank with my 2020 f150 xlt 2.7 ecoboost with a 36 gallon tank. Been shooting for 1,000 miles on a tank and think I will actually hit it next week. Anyone know if there's a record for miles on a tank of gas for my vehicle?
3.31 gear ratio ? 2wd ?
 
Anyone know if there's a record for miles on a tank of gas for my vehicle?
Not that I have heard of, yet - maybe you're the one to set the bar?

PS. I kinda think I wouldn't like driving around you. Where do you live and what are the details on your truck so I can avoid you. I don't want you to slow me down or run me over when you're coasting down the hills! ;)
 
Anyone know if there's a record for miles on a tank of gas for my vehicle?
Yea, you. :)
Although there are a fair amount of fellas that get better than Powerboost mileage with those Gen14 2.7's

It's a good argument that Ford might have built a better Powerboost if they had chosen to use the 2.7 rather than the 3.5.
Honestly, I happen to agree!

It's such a great motor in so many ways.
 
Discussion starter · #30 ·
View attachment 179920

I've been consistently getting 900 miles per tank with my 2020 f150 xlt 2.7 ecoboost with a 36 gallon tank. Been shooting for 1,000 miles on a tank and think I will actually hit it next week. Anyone know if there's a record for miles on a tank of gas for my vehicle? View attachment 179920
Yeah, please explain to us a little bit more about how you use the truck, etc. You're getting more than 50% better gas mileage than anybody else replying here. Its bit hard to believe but I'm sure your explanation will shed some light
 
Yeah, please explain to us a little bit more about how you use the truck, etc. You're getting more than 50% better gas mileage than anybody else replying here. Its bit hard to believe but I'm sure your explanation will shed some light
No, he is not getting "50% better gas mileage than anybody else replying here". 900 miles divided by 36 gallons is 25 MPG.

My poor neglected 2.7EB's fool computer reported 25.2 MPG yesterday on 140 miles with dirtbike in back and some bit of that crawling off-road. At least 10 minutes idling (even with ASS). Air conditioner was straining in the heat. Last filled the tank in February, and then only added 8 gallons.

Don't know how much will have been lost to evaporation all those months but based on past results during regular use the 25.2 displayed would work out closer to 24 miles divided by gallons.

Perhaps the simple answer is to not go dicking with the tires, tune, or "leveling". Then again I do have a drag-inducing 28" amateur radio antenna sticking out the center of my roof.
 
Another thing to consider is 844 miles in 26 hours is 32 MPH moving average. No idea as to how much time stopped. I know I can get the fool computer to indicate over 30 MPG at 40-45 MPH.
 
Discussion starter · #33 ·
No, he is not getting "50% better gas mileage than anybody else replying here". 900 miles divided by 36 gallons is 25 MPG.

My poor neglected 2.7EB's fool computer reported 25.2 MPG yesterday on 140 miles with dirtbike in back and some bit of that crawling off-road. At least 10 minutes idling (even with ASS). Air conditioner was straining in the heat. Last filled the tank in February, and then only added 8 gallons.

Don't know how much will have been lost to evaporation all those months but based on past results during regular use the 25.2 displayed would work out closer to 24 miles divided by gallons.

Perhaps the simple answer is to not go dicking with the tires, tune, or "leveling". Then again I do have a drag-inducing 28" amateur radio antenna sticking out the center of my roof.
ok so here is the explanation.
No, he is not getting "50% better gas mileage than anybody else replying here". 900 miles divided by 36 gallons is 25 MPG.

My poor neglected 2.7EB's fool computer reported 25.2 MPG yesterday on 140 miles with dirtbike in back and some bit of that crawling off-road. At least 10 minutes idling (even with ASS). Air conditioner was straining in the heat. Last filled the tank in February, and then only added 8 gallons.

Don't know how much will have been lost to evaporation all those months but based on past results during regular use the 25.2 displayed would work out closer to 24 miles divided by gallons.

Perhaps the simple answer is to not go dicking with the tires, tune, or "leveling". Then again I do have a drag-inducing 28" amateur radio antenna sticking out the center of my roof.
well, actually he is getting 50% better. Most, including myself, are claiming 16-18 MPG long term, mixed driving. lets use 17mpg..... 17mpg+50%= 25.5mpg.

The explanation could have been simply that he, and you, drive more on open highways and not much in the city or sitting in traffic. Hence the 30 gallon tank. Thats an upgraded tank presumably for long distances.

Also, his is a 2020 (gen 2 with 10 speed tranny). Mine is a 2016 (1st gen with 6 speed). There is a difference.

This is why I described everything in detail on my initial post... model, year, and my particular driving conditions (lots of city and traffic). It wasnt a competition. Just sharing data
 
21 - 33 of 33 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.