F150 Ecoboost Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

285-60-20 vs 295-60-20

12K views 11 replies 6 participants last post by  winchested  
#1 ·
I have decided to go with fuel contra wheels 20mm backspacing and either 285-60-20 fallen wild peaks or295-60-20. I need help deciding which size to go with? I also have a bilstein 5100 kit that I will be setting the front shocks to the middle level which is 1.25" (i think) and 1" blocks in the rear. My measurements right now a 37" in front wheel well and 37.5" rear wheel well. I had one shop tell me that while I am installing the leveling kit I might as well put in new front springs and leaf springs in back and lower ball joints as they are probably wore. Any truth to this after 200,000 miles? Any body running 295's or 285's with pictures?
 
#2 ·
285/60R/20 with 5100 bilstien's on 2nd notch from bottom and 5100's on back
(Without Air bags)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmore328
Save
#5 ·
That's completely up to you and your preference, but since you asked our opinion, I'll offer this info to base your decision on. :)

IMO, the matte black would look better on a white truck, but the gloss black will be much easier to clean and looks cleaner, longer.
 
Save
#7 ·
  • Like
Reactions: snakebitten
Save
#8 · (Edited)
Here's a great resource for tire sizes:

https://tiresize.com/calculator/

Mine's a city truck, which pulls utility and ATV trailers, so I use all-season or summer performance tires.
I went with 285/50-20, so my speedometer only changed 1 MPH at 70. I was ready to pull the trigger on 295/45-20 General UHP, but it was the *only* tire, in that size and Kelly was going to discontinue making them... Do like the MPG bump the Michelins give me, but with the truck now tuned, I need all the traction I can get :)
 
Save
#9 ·
What ever you do don't come back here whining about your fuel mileage. Haha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmore328
Save
#11 ·
For me 1-2 on average
 
Save
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.